论文部分内容阅读
奥康纳以“第二重矛盾”理论为基础,提出改良环境工业以化解资本主义双重危机的方案。保罗.柏克特从理论根基、思想逻辑和方案设计三个维度对奥康纳“环境工业批判”思想的激进批判,实现了三大方面的超越:从外部嫁接到内部发掘历史唯物主义的生态内涵;从资产阶级生态技术主义意识形态到历史唯物主义的文明转型实践;从阶级力量的淡化到当代社会主义运动新政治维度的激活。同时,柏克特激进的“环境工业批判”思想也由于缺乏“去资本主义工业化”的现实途径设计,难逃“绿色乌托邦情结”的指责。
Based on the “second contradiction” theory, O’Connor put forward a plan to improve the environmental industry to resolve the double crisis of capitalism. Paul Beckett’s radical criticism of O’Connor’s critique of environmental industry in three dimensions of theoretical foundation, ideological logic and program design has achieved transcendence in three aspects: from the external grafting to the internal excavation of historical materialism Ecological connotation; from the bourgeois ideology of ecotechnology to the historical materialism’s transformation of civilization; from the desalination of class power to the activation of the new political dimension of the contemporary socialist movement. At the same time, Beckett’s radical “Environmental Industrial Criticism” has also been criticized for lacking “a realistic approach to capitalist industrialization” and “green utopian complex.”