论文部分内容阅读
清朝末年,学术界流传过年青的孙诒让写《札迻》与年迈的俞樾为《札迻》写序的佳话。《札迻》是孙诒让的一部处女作。当他把《札迻》送给俞樾看的时候,俞樾已是学术界享有盛誉的著名学者。孙诒让在《札迻》自序中的口气非常大,说《札迻》“必有谊据”,而绝无“孤证肊说”。对于前辈朴学家,他推崇和钦佩的只是高邮王念孙、王引之父子两人,认为“其余诸家,得失间出。”谈到俞樾时,只说他“论著尤众”;从上下文看,明明是把俞樾放在“得失间出”的“其余诸家”当中。在《札迻》中,跟俞樾驳辩的地方也不少,直接指出俞樾著作中“非是”、“非”的就有数十处。
At the end of the Qing Dynasty, Sun Yat-Sen, a young man in the academic circle, wrote the story of “Sapporo” and the older Yu Yue as the author. “Sapporo move” is Sun Yat-sen’s debut. When he handed “Sapporo move” to Yu Yu to see when Yu 樾 is a renowned academic scholars well-known scholar. Sun Yat-sen in the “Sapporo move,” the order of the tone is very large, saying “Sapporo move” “there must be Yi,” and there is no “lingering evidence.” For his predecessor, Park Scholar, he esteemed and admired only Gaoyou Wang Sun and Wang Yin’s father and son, saying that “the rest of the family have both gains and losses.” When talking about Yu Yu, he only said that “treatise is especially popular”; from a contextual perspective, It is Yu Yu on the “gains and losses out of” “the rest of them” among them. In the “Sapporo Movement”, there are quite a few places to argue with Yu Kuo. It directly points out that there are dozens of Yu Fei’s works that are “non” and “non”.