论文部分内容阅读
丰富的矿产资源是发展工业的天然优势。2009年6月美欧因中国稀有工业原材料出口问题将中国诉上WTO,是资源大国与资源小国在法律制度体系上博弈的具体体现。中国在这一争议中的失利,对目前正处于争讼中的稀土出口争端有重大影响。通过分析该案,并思考WTO对该问题的裁定如何将我国提出的理由驳回,进一步联系中国稀土出口这一类似问题,可指导中国在这方面作出如要求稀土出口商获得环保认证等方面的措施。
Rich mineral resources are the natural advantages of industrial development. In June 2009, the United States and Europe sued China for WTO on the issue of the export of rare industrial raw materials in China. This is a concrete manifestation of the game in the legal system between the big resource countries and small resource countries. China’s defeat in this dispute has a significant impact on the dispute over the export of rare earths currently in the course of the dispute. By analyzing the case and considering how WTO’s ruling on the issue dismisses China’s proposed reasons and furthering on the similar issue of China’s rare earth exports, it can guide China in such areas as requiring Rare Earth Exporters to obtain environmental certification measures .