论文部分内容阅读
文化大革命前的某些《水浒》评论文章,把宋江的“只反贪官,不反皇帝”的投降主义政治纲领,说成是农民阶级固有的局限性,认为“农民革命思想往往是不否定皇帝制度的”。从这个观点出发,他们为投降派宋江辩护说:“我们不能以现代的思想水平要求宋江,怨他不该妥协,骂他是投降主义者,出卖了农民革命。因为农民革命本身就是不彻底的,这是由于历史条件的限制。”这种论点,否定了中国农民起义反封建的伟大意义,为投降主义路线辩护,是一种错误的观点。
Certain “Water Margin” essays prior to the Cultural Revolution described Song Jiang's capitulationist political program of “opposing corrupt officials and not anti-emperors” as an inherent limitation of the peasant class. They held that “peasant revolutionary ideas often do not deny the emperor Institutional ”. From this point of view, they defended Song Jiang, the capitulationist, saying: “We can not demand Song Jiang at the modern ideological level, complain that he should not compromise, criticize him as capitulationist and betrayed the peasant revolution, for the peasant revolution itself is not complete This is due to the limitation of historical conditions. ”This argument negates the great significance of the anti-feudalism of peasant uprising in China and justifies the capitulation. It is a wrong viewpoint.