论文部分内容阅读
作者指出,强度—时间(S—D)曲线测定从基础研究转入临床应用,有许多方面发生改变,特别是在不同时间和不同检查者测定时,对其可靠性存在相反的观点,但对其所获的资料,均缺乏统计学分析.近三十年来,学者们认为,强度—时间曲线仍然是判断神经—肌肉功能完整性的可靠指标.但文献没有回答在这二种情况下——不同时间和不同检查者测定强度—时间曲线结果的一致性问题.因此,本文作者确定研究这二个主要问题.受检查者共24名,均为无神经病史的健康男性,年龄21～53岁(平均30.6岁).为减少误差,随机选择右或左侧胫前肌进行检查.检查时,受检
The authors note that there are many aspects of the S-D curve shift from basic to clinical use that change, especially when measured at different times and by different examiners, in terms of their reliability. However, The data obtained are lack of statistical analysis.For nearly thirty years, scholars believe that the intensity-time curve is still a reliable indicator to judge the neuromuscular integrity.However, the literature does not answer in both cases - Different time and different examiners to determine the consistency of the intensity-time curve results.Therefore, the author of this study to determine the two major issues.A total of 24 subjects were examined, are non-neurological history of healthy men, aged 21 to 53 years (Average 30.6 years old) .In order to reduce the error, randomly select the right or left tibialis anterior muscle for examination.