论文部分内容阅读
如果相濡以沫的亲人离您而去,您是否希望按照亲人的遗愿处理后事?您是否希望按照自己的方式抚慰心灵的创伤?……这些问题似乎很简单,相信人人都会作出肯定的回答,因为这是人之常情,或者说,它是社会的基本伦理规范。然而,一个记者,面对这样的提问,却不可避免地陷入了两难境地:作为普通人,回答自然也是肯定的,尊重当事人,尊重死者,这是起码的道德规范;但是,作为记者,为了工作,出于职业需要,有责任为重大事件留下记录,有责任报道受众希望知道的新闻——因此,他也许不得不打扰未亡人,不顾死者遗嘱,闯入现场,公开报道:这究竟是有道德还是不道德?
If your relatives are away from you, do you want to handle the funeral according to their loved ones’ wishes? Do you want to soothe your wounds in your own way? ... These questions seem simple and I believe everyone will give an affirmative answer because This is human nature, or it is the basic ethical norms of society. However, a journalist who is facing such questions inevitably plunges into a dilemma: answering nature as an ordinary person is affirmative. Respecting the parties and respecting the deceased is a minimum code of ethics; however, as a reporter, in order to work , Because of his professional needs he is responsible for keeping track of major events and for reporting the news the audience wants to know - so he may have to disturb the survivors, breaking into the scene despite the will of the deceased, and publicly reporting: Is this ethical Still unethical?