论文部分内容阅读
在法律上建筑物所有权为无期物权,以永续存在为其基本法律特征。因此,建筑物所有权的无期限性与土地使用权有限期性两者的冲突就势所难免,就此种矛盾,我国《物权法》第149条规定:住宅建设用地使用权期间届满的,自动续期。非住宅建设用地使用权期间届满后的续期,依照法律规定办理。该土地上的房屋及其他不动产的归属,有约定的,按照约定;没有约定或者约定不明确的,依照法律、行政法规的规定办理。而从法治发达国家的立法经验来看,我国现行的这一规定的合理性是有所欠缺的。本文通过域外立法例的考察,借鉴域外的立法结合我国公有制土地制度,以期构建一个符合双方利益协调的模式。
In the legal ownership of buildings as unexpired property, to perpetuate its basic legal characteristics. Therefore, the conflict between the indefinite period of building ownership and the limited period of land use rights is inevitable. As for the contradiction, Article 149 of the Real Right Law of our country stipulates that the expiration of the right of use of residential building land shall be automatically renewed. The renewal of the non-residential construction land after the expiration of the right of use shall be handled in accordance with the law. Where the ownership of the houses and other realties on the land is agreed upon according to the agreement, if there is no agreement or the agreement is not clear, it shall be handled in accordance with the provisions of laws and administrative regulations. Judging from the legislative experience of the developed countries in the rule of law, the rationality of the current provisions of our country is lacking. This article examines the legislation outside the territory, drawing on the legislation outside the territory with the public land system in China, with a view to building a model that is in harmony with the interests of both parties.