论文部分内容阅读
《中小学数学》(小学版)已刊登了三篇关于“不知次品轻重找次品”的文章。文章从不同的角度探索着在不知道次品轻重的前提下,如何用最少的次数保证找出次品的方法,并试图揭示其规律。可惜的是,虽然已历时一年半的时间,也经过了否定之否定,但方法与规律仍存在着很大的错误。究其原因在于探究的思路囿于常规思维。现就陆善岩老师的《用合理的方法导出合适的结论》(以下简称陆文),谈一点自己的看法,恳请各位同行及陆老师赐教。
“Primary and secondary mathematics” (primary school edition) has published three articles on “I do not know the inferiority of light to find defective ” article. From different angles, the article explores how to ensure that defective products can be identified with the least number of times without knowing the importance of defective products, and attempts to reveal its laws. Unfortunately, although it has lasted for a year and a half, it has also passed a negative negation. However, there are still great mistakes in the methods and laws. The reason lies in the exploration of ideas in the conventional thinking. Now I am going to talk about my point of view about the “reasonable conclusion derived by Lu Shanyan” (hereinafter referred to as Lu Wen), and I sincerely urge all of you colleagues and Professor Lu to enlighten me.