论文部分内容阅读
每年秋季学期伊始,关于各地语文教材的变化,都会成为社会公众的关注热点。近些年来引发较大争议的是鲁迅作品的删减,关于“教材换血—鲁迅大撤退”的讨论曾一度叫嚣于网络。这种关注背后,是社会各界对该如何教育好下一代的关心和思考。角度决定深度,站在不同角度看待这个教育现象的存在,某种程度上意味着思维的多样化,而研究这个多向思维可以给一线的语文教师看待语文教育中的诸多问题一些启示。
At the beginning of each autumn semester, changes in the language teaching materials in various places will become the focus of public concern. The controversy that sparked much controversy in recent years is the deletion of Lu Xun’s work. The discussion on the “exchange of blood for teaching material - the withdrawal of Lu Xun” was once clamored by the Internet. Behind this concern is the concern and consideration of all walks of life on how to educate the next generation. The angle determines the depth, standing from a different perspective on the existence of this educational phenomenon, to some extent, means that the diversity of thinking, and studying this multi-directional thinking can give frontline language teachers some views on the problems in Chinese education.