论文部分内容阅读
社会转型必然催生新型的利益和权利关系,新型的利益和权利关系必然要有相应的法律保护。面对新型权益纠纷,一方面司法者应当遵守司法权的被动性,奉行不告不理的原则;另一方面,司法者在案件受理后的司法过程中需要发挥司法能动性,秉承正义的法律价值和理念,遵循法律原则,并充分运用司法经验,正确地适用法律,在理性地对案件的事实问题和法律问题作出判断的基础上行使裁判权,以解决纠纷,维护社会公平正义和秩序。司法者在司法过程中理性的司法能动不仅有助于社会秩序重构和形成调整新型社会关系的规则,而且有助于新型权益的生成和维护以及司法改革的目标司法公正与效率的实现。司法者在司法过程中只有遵循司法能动的正当性、合理界定司法能动与司法被动的界限并妥善处理二者的关系,才会达到司法的法律效果和社会效果的有机统一。
Social transformation inevitably leads to a new type of interests and rights relations, the new type of interests and rights relations must have the corresponding legal protection. In the face of new types of disputes over rights and interests, on the one hand, the judiciary should abide by the passive nature of judicial power and abide by the principle of impartiality. On the other hand, the judicial personnel need to exert judicial initiative and uphold the legal value of justice in the judicial process after the case is accepted And concepts, follow the principle of law, make full use of judicial experience, correctly apply laws, exercise jurisdiction over judgments based on factual and legal issues of cases in a rational manner so as to resolve disputes and safeguard social fairness, justice and order. The judiciary’s rational judicial initiative during the judicial process not only helps to reconstruct the social order and form rules that regulate new social relations, but also contributes to the formation and maintenance of new types of rights and interests and the realization of judicial fairness and efficiency in the goal of judicial reform. Only when the judicial person follows the judicial legitimacy of the judicial activity, reasonably defines the boundary between the judicial active and the judicial passive and properly handles the relationship between the two, can the judicial unity of law and social effect be achieved.