论文部分内容阅读
自艺术学理论学科成立以来,在该学科的学科构架中,艺术学原理著作虽然受文学理论研究思维惯性影响,其研究成果却不断面世,且艺术学的学科意识越来越强。受以史为鉴这一学术传统的影响,艺术史的研究一直是最为深厚和扎实的领域。但是,既属于艺术批评学又属于艺术史的艺术批评史,其研究成果一直局促于门类艺术批评史。在以打通门类艺术为宗旨的艺术学理论视野下,由东南大学艺术学院教授凌继尧主编的《中国艺术批评史》的再版(辽宁美术出版社,2013年版,该书由凌继尧、张爱红、张晓刚和黄桂娥分章撰写,后三者都是东南大学艺术学院培养的博士)无疑对改变艺术批评史的研究现状有着重要的现实意义。
Since the establishment of the discipline of art theory, although the works of art theory have been influenced by the inertia of literary theory research, their research achievements have been published continuously in the disciplinary framework of the discipline, and the disciplinary consciousness of art studies is getting stronger and stronger. Influenced by the academic tradition of learning from history, the study of art history has always been the most profound and solid one. However, the history of art criticism belongs to art criticism as well as art history, and its research results have been urged to criticize the history of art genre. From the perspective of art theory with the aim of opening up the art of door art, the second edition of “History of Chinese Art Criticism” edited by Professor Ling Jiyao of Southeast University School of Art (Liaoning Fine Arts Publishing House, 2013 edition, edited by Ling Jiyao, Zhang Aihong, Zhang Xiaogang and Huang Gui E Chapter writing, the latter three are from the Southeast University School of Art PhD) undoubtedly change the history of art criticism of the study has an important practical significance.