借打手机并采用殴打手段拒不返还该如何定性

• 作 者: 张永
• 机 构: 河南警察学院治安系,
• 出 处: 法制与社会
• 发表日期: 2010年30期
• 关键词: 抢劫罪 身体强制行为 因果关系

抢劫罪的一个基本特征是对被害人的身体强制,这种强制可以是暴力性强制,也可能是非暴力性强制。在非暴力强制的情形下,就可能出现欺骗性的手段。这是可能会与诈骗罪的界限发生模糊。但是只要财物失控的最终结果是由强制性手段造成的,而不是因被害人因为被骗而“自愿”交付,都应明确地定性为抢劫罪。

A basic feature of the crime of robbery is the physical coercion of the victim. Such coercion can be either coercive or non-violent. Under non-violent coercion, deceptive means may emerge. This is likely to blur the line with fraud. However, as long as the final result of the loss of property is caused by coercive means, rather than being “voluntarily” delivered by the victim because of being deceived, it should be clearly characterized as a crime of robbery.