论文部分内容阅读
记分牌上的比分是71比49,热队几乎已经锁定了在新赛季的首个主场胜利。此时,和这个比分极不搭调的一幕出现了:詹姆斯抢断理查德森时犯规,裁判鸣哨后他惯性小跑几步——这个再正常不过的举动,竟然招致了一次技术犯规。詹姆斯一脸无辜地看着裁判,却不敢再说一句话,他知道在“零容忍”规则的庇护下,已经失去理性的裁判们会因为他一句“Why”而将他清出赛场。有意思的是,这时候摄像镜头给到了亲临现场的NBA4总裁大卫·斯特恩——他的笑而不语或许是在夸赞裁判干得好,但他大概也应该从反对声中意识到什么了——“零容忍”或许能净化了一些赛场不良风气,却扼杀了球员的激情以及比赛的精彩。毫无疑问,这是一项“弊大于利”的举措。
The scoreboard score is 71 to 49, the Heat have almost locked in the first home victory in the new season. At this point, and the very match of the scene there: James steals when Richardson fouls, the referee whistles after a few steps of inertia trot - the more normal behavior, even incur a technical foul. James looked innocently at the referee, but did not dare to say a word again. He knew that under the aegis of “zero tolerance,” the referee who had lost his reason would clear him up because of his “Why”. Stadium. Interestingly, this time the camera lens to the scene of the NBA4 president David Stern - his laughed perhaps praised the referee did well, but he should probably be aware of what the opposition - “zero tolerance ” may be able to purify some bad atmosphere of the track, but kill the passion of the players and the game’s wonderful. There is no doubt that this is a “more harm than good” move.