论文部分内容阅读
目的:本文主要是对比GP方案、NP方案在非小细胞癌临床上的应用效果。方法:将160例晚期非小细胞癌患者分成观察组和对照组各80例,要注意应按照随机的方式划分且每组不少于80人,并且给对照组给予NP方案,观察组给GP方案,然后对比患者在两种治疗方案下的效果。结果:分别对两组患者进行完整疗程的治疗后,发现两组治疗效果的有效率相差无几,但是有部分患者会发生血小板减少或者白细胞减少的毒副作用。结论:GP方案和NP方案在治疗晚期非小细胞癌上都可取得相对的治疗有效率,而且对患者进行完整治疗后的毒素效果并无明显差异。因此在治疗晚期非小细胞癌时,两种方案都可以取得不错的临床应用效果。
Objective: This article is mainly to compare the GP program, NP program in non-small cell cancer clinical application. Methods: One hundred and sixty patients with advanced NSCLC were divided into observation group and control group, 80 cases in each group. Attention should be divided into random groups and no less than 80 in each group. The control group was given NP protocol. The observation group was given GP Program, and then compare the effect of the patients under both treatment regimens. Results: After the two groups of patients were treated with a complete course of treatment, the effective rates of the two groups of treatment were similar, but some patients had thrombocytopenia or leukopenia. Conclusion: The GP and NP regimens are relatively effective in treating advanced non-small cell carcinoma, and there is no significant difference in the toxin effect after complete treatment. Therefore, in the treatment of advanced non-small cell carcinoma, both programs can achieve good clinical effect.