论文部分内容阅读
苏联时期以前的俄国哲学史研究最初是基于纯粹的“个人兴趣”和“学术目的”,后来哲学史视域成了政治斗争的阵地,苏联时期的“俄国哲学史”研究体现了某种特定的“俄国哲学史观”。1947年亚历山大洛夫《西欧哲学史》全苏哲学讨论会成为苏联“哲学史”和“俄国哲学史”研究的转折点,自此后所有作品都遵循以定义开始、引经据典等体例。马斯林主编的《俄国哲学史》成为哲学史观和俄国哲学史观变化的标志之一,该书的框架和内容表明了他们自己的“俄国哲学史观”,虽并不代表现今整个俄国哲学界的观点,但却为世人提供了一个审视和解读当今俄国哲学界的“哲学观”和“哲学史观”的具体参照物。
The study of the history of Russian philosophy before the Soviet Union was initially based on pure “personal interests” and “academic purposes.” Later on, the field of philosophical history became a political struggle. The study of the history of Russian philosophy in the Soviet Union reflected a specific “The History of Russian Philosophy”. In 1947 Alexander Love’s “Philosophy History of Western Europe” All-Soviet Philosophy Symposium became a turning point in the study of Soviet “Philosophical History” and “History of Russian Philosophy.” Since then, all works have followed the principles of defining and starting with quotations. Maslin’s “History of Russian Philosophy” became one of the hallmarks of the change in the conception of history of philosophy and the history of philosophy in Russia. The framework and contents of this book show their own “concept of the history of Russian philosophy,” which does not represent the entire Russian philosophy But it provides the world with a concrete reference to examine and interpret the “philosophical view” and “the history of philosophical history” of today’s Russian philosophical community.