论文部分内容阅读
为什么要“破例”转载这样一篇“杂文” ?是因为它写出了一种“状态”吗 ?作出了一种“判断”吗 ?说了本刊的“好话”因而编者“完全”同意其观点及表达方式吗 ?《商榷与正误》已经并将继续引起“关注” ,令人高兴 ,一切尽在不言中……
Why is it necessary to “reproduce” such an “essay” because it wrote a “state”? Did it make a “judgment”? Say the “good words” of the publication and the editor “completely” agreed with it. Are opinions and ways of expression? “Deliberation and correctness” has been and will continue to cause “concern”. It’s pleasing. Everything goes without saying...