论文部分内容阅读
对于科学原始性,从选择机制方面谈有两个问题值得注重。第一点是创造性的选择导向性问题。需要分清创造力、智力、知识、死记硬背(即应试能力)。心理学早已研究出创造力与智力并不相关,即智力很高的人并不一定创造力就高,创造力高的人并不一定就智力高。科学的发展、突破当然最重要的是创造力。从中小学到大学、硕士、博士的培养,中国与西方发达国家相比很重要的一个差别就是西方国家重视创造力的培养,中国重视知识、死记硬背的培养。现在中小
For scientific primordiality, there are two issues that deserve attention in terms of the selection mechanism. The first point is creative choice-oriented issues. Need to distinguish creativity, intelligence, knowledge, rote (that is, test-taking ability). Psychology has long been the study of creativity and intelligence are not related, that is, people with high intelligence do not necessarily high creativity, high creativity does not necessarily have high intelligence. The development of science, of course, the most important breakthrough is creativity. From primary and middle schools to universities, master's and doctoral programs, one of the most important differences between China and developed countries in the West is that the western countries attach importance to the cultivation of creativity and China values knowledge and rote learning. Now small and medium