论文部分内容阅读
由国家自然科学基金委员会组织编写的《自然科学学科发展战略调研报告:分析化学》(科学出版社,1993年,以下简称“报告”)是一本好书,值得一读。 “报告”讨论了分析化学学科在科学研究和国民经济建设中的地位和作用,评述了分析化学学科的发展过程,从提高灵敏度、改善选择性、扩展时空多维信息等八个方面,综述了分析化学的发展趋势和前沿;分析了我国分析化学的发展现状、面临形势、有利条件和制约因素;提出了近5~10年分析化学发展的战略设想、方向和目标,应优先发展的重要领域和前沿课题及应采取的措施和建议。 “报告”中提出的许多论点、设想和建议,具有较高的科学性和权威性。它不是哪一个部门或哪一个人的作品,而是国内很多分析化学家集体智慧的结晶,是大家的共识和预测。为了写出这份“报告”,首先组成了“分析化学学科发展战略研究组”,进行调查研究,写出“报告”初稿,然后以书面或座谈会方式听取国内各方面专家的意见,最后由“分析化学学科发展战略研究评审组”认真评议认可。“报告”的研究组和评审组都由分析化学界各方面的学术带头人和权威科学家组成。两组共有知名学者达30人之多,所以这个“报告”具有较高的科学性和权威性。“报告”提出的看法和意见,在一定程度上有重要的指导意义。
The Research Report on the Development Strategy of Natural Science Discipline compiled by the National Natural Science Foundation of China: Analytical Chemistry (Science Press, 1993, hereinafter referred to as the “Report”) is a good book worth reading. The Report discusses the status and role of analytical chemistry in scientific research and national economic construction. It reviews the development of analytical chemistry and summarizes the analysis from eight aspects: improving sensitivity, improving selectivity, and expanding space-time multidimensional information The development trend and the frontier of the chemistry; Analyzed the present situation of the development of the analytical chemistry in our country, facing the situation, the favorable conditions and the restriction factors; Put forward the strategic vision, direction and goal of the development of analytical chemistry in the recent 5 ~ 10 years, Cutting-edge issues and measures to be taken and recommendations. Many of the arguments, ideas and suggestions put forward in the “Report” are highly scientific and authoritative. It is not which department or which person’s work, but the crystallization of the collective wisdom of many domestic analytical chemists, it is everyone’s consensus and forecast. In order to write this Report, we first formed the Analytical Chemistry Discipline Development Strategy Study Group to conduct a survey and study, wrote the first draft of the report, and then listened to the opinions of experts in various fields in China in written or informal discussions. Finally, “Analytical Chemistry Development Strategy Research Review Group” seriously commended. The Report’s study and review teams are comprised of academic leaders and authoritative scientists in all aspects of analytical chemistry. There are more than 30 famous scholars in both groups, so this report is highly scientific and authoritative. The views and opinions set forth in the “Report” have an important guiding significance to some extent.