论文部分内容阅读
WTO的争端解决机制在实践中稳健地运行,已日益成为通行的国际贸易争端解决机制,对全球多边贸易体制做出了巨大的贡献。其中的执行程序更可谓是该机制的安全阀,被认为是为WTO装上了“牙齿”。然而,该机制并非尽善尽美,它依然在不断演变和发展中。其中,执行程序存在的漏洞也暴露无遗。学者普遍认为,所有经司法解决的争端中,不论是国内法还是国际法,最终的关键问题在于是否能执行。如果没有良好完善的执行程序,司法裁决的结果只是形式意义上的,对争端各方并无实效。本文结合具体案例,探讨了世界贸易组织争端解决机制执行程序中“合理期限”存在的缺陷,并提出了相关的解决建议。
The WTO dispute settlement mechanism, which has been functioning steadily in practice, has increasingly become a popular mechanism for resolving international trade disputes and made a tremendous contribution to the global multilateral trading system. One of the enforcement procedures is the safety valve of the mechanism, which is considered to be “teeth” for the WTO. However, the mechanism is not perfect, it is still evolving and developing. Among them, the loopholes in the implementation of the program are also exposed. Scholars generally agree that the ultimate key issue in all the disputes that are resolved by the judiciary, whether domestic law or international law, lies in its implementation. Without sound and sound enforcement procedures, the result of a judicial decision is formal and will not be effective against all parties to the dispute. In this paper, we discuss the shortcomings of “reasonable deadline ” in the enforcement procedures of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism with specific cases and put forward relevant solutions.