论文部分内容阅读
在过去战争年代和狠抓阶级斗争的年代,史学是很受重视的,但是过分强调了史学与现实的联系。特别是有一个时期,对史学的社会功用采取急功近利的态度,结果是混淆了史学与政治的关系,败坏了史学的声誉。最近十几年,史学又受到冷遇,跌入了低谷。发表史学论文的学术刊物越来越少,史学队伍日益萎缩。似乎在改革开放年代里,史学无用了。 其实在改革开放年代里,史学是大有可为的。毛泽东之所以重视历史研究,是因为他把研究祖国的历史看作是认识中国国情,把马克思主义理论与中国实际相结合的重要一步。我们今天要建设具有中国特色的社会主义,同样面临着把马克思主义理论与中国实
In the era of the past wars and the class struggle, historiography received great attention, but overemphasized the link between history and reality. In particular, there was a period of quick success and quick succession toward the social function of historiography. As a result, the relationship between history and politics was confused and the reputation of history was ruined. The past ten years, historians have been cold reception, fell into the trough. There are fewer and fewer academic journals publishing historiography, and the historiography team is shrinking day by day. It seems that in the era of reform and opening up, historiography was useless. In fact, in the era of reform and opening up, historiography is promising. Mao Zedong’s emphasis on historical studies is because he regarded studying the history of the motherland as an important step in recognizing China’s national conditions and integrating Marxist theory with the reality of China. Today, we must build socialism with Chinese characteristics and face the same challenge of combining Marxist theory with China’s reality