论文部分内容阅读
指假为真的“鉴定”客观地说,这几年来笔者一直在关注着书画拍品的真假问题,为此写过数百篇鉴定和质疑某些身为国家文物鉴定委员会、故宫博物院以及央视《鉴宝》节目的专家和一些所谓新生代鉴定家签署的“鉴定证书”以及类似“鉴定证书”的文章见诸藏界媒体。此类扰乱市场、混淆视听的鉴定归纳起来,有如下几种类型:一、煞有介事指假为真的题跋鉴定,诸如此类的题跋只要打开历
Refers to the fake is true “Identification ” Objectively speaking, in recent years I have been concerned about the authenticity of the paintings and calligraphy auction for this reason, wrote hundreds of identification and questioning some as the National Heritage Committee, the National Palace Museum As well as the CCTV “Kam Po” program experts and some so-called new generation of connoisseurs signed “appraisal certificate ” and similar “appraisal certificate ” article see the Tibetan media. Such disruption of the market, confusing the identification of audio-visual summed up, there are the following types: First, there are significant means that the inscription is true inscriptions, such as Postscript Just open the calendar