论文部分内容阅读
抽象学说是经验主义者处理普遍与个别的哲学关系的基本理论。在近代哲学争论中,贝克莱对洛克的抽象观念理论的批评已是老生常谈,然而,随着对这两位哲学家的逐渐深入的阅读,这场关于抽象观念的争论也获得了进行重新解读的可能。文章通过对洛克文本的研究,力图提出对洛克抽象学说的新解释,从而为之辩护。在此基础上,还将反驳当代的洛克研究者艾耶斯的“部分考虑”说的解释,验证文章的辩护方案。
Abstract theory is the basic theory that empiricists deal with universal and individual philosophical relations. In modern philosophical debates, Berkeley’s critique of Locke’s theory of abstract ideas is a commonplace. However, as the two philosophers gradually read in depth, the controversy over abstract ideas was also reinterpreted may. Through the study of Locke’s text, the article tries hard to come up with a new interpretation of Locke’s abstract theory and thus defend it. On this basis, we will also refute the explanation of the “partial consideration” of contemporary Locke researcher Ieyes and verify the defense plan of the article.