论文部分内容阅读
海登.怀特的后现代历史叙事理论,在瓦莱里、海德格尔、萨特、列维—斯特劳斯等质疑历史客观性和真实性及强调历史文本虚构成分的基础上,进一步在本质上将历史文本看作“文学虚构”的“纯粹语言制品”。本文通过对怀特历史叙事多层面话语系统和阐释模式的分析,重新透视历史叙事中真实与虚构的关系,试图为史学和文学批评尤其是历史文学方面以叙事为主导的文学样式寻找理论依据。
Hayden White’s theory of postmodern historical narration, in Valery, Heidegger, Sartre, Levi-Strauss and other questioned the historical objectivity and authenticity and emphasizes the historical text of the fictional component, based on further In essence, historical texts are regarded as “purely language products ” in “Literary Fiction ”. By analyzing the multi-level discourse system and interpreting mode of the historical narrative of White, this paper re-examines the relationship between reality and fiction in the historical narrative and attempts to find a theoretical basis for the historical style and literary criticism, especially in the historical literature.