论文部分内容阅读
以前,我们公司有些同志认为,“开门办科研”和“关门办科研”,只是个方法问题,说什么:“在大楼里,照样可以出成果,照样可以革命化。”有的人单纯抱着“推广成果”、“寻找试验条件”的目的下厂,摆不正革命与科研、科研与生产、技术人员和工人群众的关系。在学大庆的过程中,特别是今年以来,经过无产阶级专政理论的学习,我们把是否坚持开门办科研提到“走什么道路”的高度来认识。大家提高了“开门办科研”的自觉性,总结出搞科研要“三破三坚持”的经验:
In the past, some comrades in our company believed that “opening a door for scientific research” and “closing a door for conducting scientific research” are only a matter of method. What they say: “In the building, the result can still be achieved, but it can still be revolutionized.” Some people simply hold The purpose of “promoting achievements” and “finding experimental conditions” is to reduce the number of revolutions to the relations between scientific research, scientific research and production, technicians and workers and the masses. In the process of learning Daqing, especially since this year, after studying the theory of proletarian dictatorship, we have come to understand whether we insist on opening a door to the point where scientific research refers to the “what road to go”. We raised the awareness of “open the door to do scientific research”, summed up the scientific research to “three broken three adherence” experience: