论文部分内容阅读
在我国古代的典籍中,经常出现“宪”与“宪法”的词语,但这并不意味着我国古代就有现代意义的宪法。现代意义的宪法是资产阶级革命的产物。资产阶级革命取得胜利后,已具备了制定宪法的经济、政治和思想条件,而中国古代不具备宪法产生的条件,所以我国古代典籍中出现的“宪”与“宪法”仅指一般法律,有时还指某种官职、机构等,本文逐一作了分析,它们都不具有根本法的意义。
In the ancient books of our country, the words “constitutional” and “constitutional” often appear, but this does not mean that our country has a modern constitution in ancient times. The modern sense of the constitution is the product of the bourgeois revolution. After the victory of the bourgeois revolution, we already have the economic, political and ideological conditions for the formulation of the Constitution. However, the ancient Chinese did not have the conditions for the constitution to emerge. Therefore, the “constitutional” and “constitutional” The general law, sometimes also refers to some kind of government office, organization, etc. The article analyzes one by one, none of them have the meaning of fundamental law.