论文部分内容阅读
2013年重庆、南京等地开始全面禁止中小学征收择校费,但是措施一出台就遭受多方质疑。根据现行宪法,国家在义务教育领域享有管理权,父母也有对子女教育的选择权。在国家没有实现义务教育资源均衡之前,禁止父母对子女教育的选择权并不符合宪法上受教育权的平等保护标准,必须进行改革。一方面,不能简单采取禁止择校的措施将国家均衡义务教育资源的责任“转嫁”给公民;另一方面,国家要继续加大义务教育的投入,让公民无论户籍所在、经济实力、社会地位,都能享受到优质的义务教育。
In 2013, such schools as Chongqing and Nanjing started to ban the selection of school fees by primary and secondary schools altogether, but the measures were challenged as soon as they were introduced. According to the current constitution, the state enjoys the right of management in the field of compulsory education and parents also have the right to choose their children’s education. Before the state did not realize the balance of resources for compulsory education, the prohibition of parents’ right to choose their children’s education did not meet the equal protection standard of the constitutional right to education and reform was necessary. On the one hand, we can not simply adopt a measure that forbids school choice to “shift” the responsibility of the state in compulsory education resources to citizens; on the other hand, the state should continue to increase investment in compulsory education so that citizens, irrespective of their residence, economic strength, Social status, can enjoy high quality compulsory education.