论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨两种不同挤血方法对新生儿疾病筛查采血质量的影响。方法 392例新生儿,按采血方法不同分为试验组和对照组,各196例。试验组采用双手纵握挤血法(简称纵握法)进行足底采血,对照组采用单手横握挤血法(简称横握法)进行足底采血,比较两种方法对新生儿疾病的筛查效果。结果试验组新生儿一针成功率为96.94%,高于对照组的63.27%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组足底淤血发生率为2.55%,低于对照组的10.20%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论纵握法采血除具有血滴标准、血片质优、新生儿痛苦小等普遍优点外,在采血成功率、对新生儿造成足底淤血少方面也有显著性差异,值得在临床上推广。
Objective To investigate the influence of two different methods of blood excretion on blood quality of newborn screening. Methods 392 newborns were divided into experimental group and control group according to different methods of blood sampling, with 196 cases each. In the test group, blood was taken from the plantar by two-handed longitudinal grasping and squeezing blood (longitudinal grasping method), while the control group was treated by single-handed transverse grasping and squeezing blood (transverse grasping method) Screening effect. Results The success rate of one stitch in the experimental group was 96.94%, which was higher than that in the control group (63.27%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The incidence of plantar congestion in the test group was 2.55%, which was lower than that of the control group (10.20%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusions In addition to the universal gravida blood sampling standards with blood, the quality of the blood film, newborn pain and other common advantages, the success rate of blood collection, neonatal foot congestion caused by less significant difference, it is worth in the clinical promotion.