论文部分内容阅读
重要发现:·根据VIKOR法进行排序的结果,江苏创新系统治理能力得分最接近理想值,排序第一;西藏创新系统治理能力接近负理想值,排序在尾端。因子分析法测算出的创新治理能力得分结果显示,综合得分为正的区域有10个,得分为负的区域有21个,说明这些区域创新系统治理能力低于全国平均值。·VIKOR法和因子分析法两种方法得出的结论具有较强的一致性,13个区域的排序一致,包括排名前三和排名末六位的区域;两种方法测算出来
Key findings: • According to the results of the VIKOR method, the scores of innovation system governance capacity in Jiangsu Province are closest to the ideal values and are ranked first. The capacity of innovation management system in Tibet is close to the negative ideal value, and ranked at the end. The score of innovative governance ability calculated by factor analysis shows that there are 10 regions with positive comprehensive scores and 21 regions with negative scores, indicating that the innovation system governance capacity of these regions is lower than the national average. VIKOR and factor analysis of the two methods have reached the conclusion that the consistency of the consistency of the 13 regions, including the top three and rank the last six regional; two methods to calculate