Effectiveness of Decompression Alone versus Decompression plus Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A

来源 :2016中国骨科焦点问题学术论坛 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:qzspk
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  Object: The debate on efficacy of fusion added to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is ongoing.Therefore,we conducted a meta-analysis to compared the effectiveness of decompression alone (D) and decompression plus fusion (DF) in treating patients with LSS.Methods: A literature search was performed in the Web of Science,PubMed,Embase,and Springer databases from 1970 to 2016.Relevant references were selected and the included studies were manually reviewed.We included trials evaluating decompression surgery compared to decompression plus fusion surgery in treating patients with LSS.The primary outcomes analyzed were back pain,leg pain,Oswestry Disability Index scores (ODI),the quality-of-life EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D),duration of operation,intraoperative blood loss,length of hospital stay,major complications,walking ability,number of reoperation,and finally clinically excellent and good rates.Data analysis was conducted using the Review Manager 5.2 software.Results: Fifteen studies involving 17785 patients with LSS were included.The overall effect mean difference (MD) (95% CI) in the differences between pre-and post-operative back pain,leg pain,operative time,intraoperative blood loss,and length of stay were 0.04(-0.36,0.44),0.69 (-0.38,1.76),-2.04(-3.12,-0.96),-3.96(-6.64,-1.27) and-4.21(-10.03,1.62)(z=0.18,1.26,3.71,2.89 and 1.41,respectively;p=0.86,0.55,0.0002,0.004 and 0.16,respectively) in random effects models.The overall effect MD (95% CI) in ODI,EQ-5D,and walking ability were 0.43 (-1.15,2.00),0.01 (-0.01,0.03) and 0.04 (-0.49,0.57) (z=0.52,1.16 and 0.15,respectively;p=0.59,0.24 and 0.88,respectively) in fixed effects models.The overall effect odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) of major complications,number of reoperations,and clinically excellent and good rates between the two groups were 0.70 (0.60,0.81),1.04 (0.90,1.19) and 0.31 (0.06,1.59) (z=4.63,0.53 and 1.40,respectively;p<0.00001,0.60 and 0.16,respectively).Our study reveals no difference in the effectiveness between the two surgical techniques.Conclusion: The additional fusion in the management of LSS yielded no clinical improvements over decompression alone within a two-year follow-up period.But fusion resulted in a longer duration of operation,more blood loss,and a higher risk of complications.Therefore,the appropriate surgical protocol for LSS should be discussed further.
其他文献
尽管关于药品采购领域“二次议价”存与废的争议至今尚无定论,但从政策设计者到各地执行者均认识到“二次议价”作为现阶段一种可能对降低虚高药价行之有效的采购手段有其存在必然性。本文将就“二次议价”的历史由来及现状进行分析,同时借鉴先进国家药品采购经验,对如何在现阶段构建合理药品议价模式、完善公立医院药品集中采购机制提供借鉴。
会议
目的:探讨侧卧位经横突-椎弓根单侧穿刺椎体后凸成形术治疗合并通气功能障碍的胸腰椎骨质疏松性压缩骨折的临床疗效.方法:研究共纳入12例合并通气功能障碍的胸腰椎OVCF患者,均采用局麻下侧卧位经横突-椎弓根单侧穿刺行PKP治疗,统计手术时间、术前术后及末次随访的伤椎前缘高度压缩率、VAS评分,进行疗效评价.结果:患者均顺利完成PKP手术,手术时间20-40min,平均30.5min;每个椎体注入骨水泥
目的:探讨短节段椎弓根钉固定辅助椎体内rhBMP-2结合同种异体骨植骨对预防胸腰椎爆裂骨折术后伤椎骨缺损及矫正度丢失的效果.方法:对2010年1月~2012年12月我科收治的38例胸腰椎爆裂骨折患者行同种异体骨结合rhBMP-2打压植骨治疗,对术后影像学资料进行分析,统计手术前后Cobb角、伤椎前缘高度压缩率、术后伤椎骨缺损程度.结果:38例患者均获得随访,随访时间24 ~ 35个月,平均27.3
目的:探讨肘后方单切口入路结合钢板螺钉内固定治疗向后孟氏骨折脱位的临床疗效.方法:2012年1月至2014年1月共收治向后孟氏骨折脱位患者9例,均经肘关节后方单切口行钢板螺钉内固定.术后根据Mayo肘关节功能评分及肘关节活动度等来评价肘关节功能.结果:术后患者手术切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无血管、神经损伤.9例患者均获得随访,随访时间13-32个月,平均16.3个月.X线提示骨折均愈合,愈合时间3~6个月,
目的:比较自体跖肌腱及同种异体肌腱重建喙锁韧带联合钩钢板固定治疗肩锁关节脱位的疗效差异.方法:将2013年1月-2014年6月收治并符合选择标准的33例肩锁关节脱位患者随机分为两组,分别为自体跖肌腱重建喙锁韧带结合钢板固定组(A组,17例)以及同种异体肌腱重建喙锁韧带结合钢板固定(B组,16例).术后31例患者获得随访,其中A组15例,B组16例.两组患者性别、年龄、致伤原因、侧别、伤后至手术时间
会议
会议
会议
会议