论文部分内容阅读
新历史考据学是20世纪前期中国主要的史学流派之一,它在继承清代乾嘉考据学的基础上,伴随经学的衰退、新史学的产生和新史料的发现而形成。新历史考据学与传统经学之间有千丝万缕的联系,许多新历史考证家都曾受过系统的经学教育,具有扎实的经学功底。新历史考据学把经学看成史学的材料,同时主张由经学入手来研究古史,进而在经学研究方面显示出把治经与考史相结合、超越经学今古文之争的特点。新历史考据学对待经学的态度,既扩大了史学研究的范围,同时又在治学方法和观念上开拓出新的境界,收获了累累硕果。经学与新历史考据学的关系至为密切,在探讨中国史学的近代转型时,不应忽视经学的作用和影响。
The new historical textual research is one of the major historical schools in China in the early twentieth century. Based on the succession of the textual research of Qianlong and Jiaqing in the Qing Dynasty, the new historical textual research was formed with the decline of Confucian classics, the emergence of new historiography and the discovery of new historical materials. New history textual research is inextricably linked to traditional Confucian classics, and many new historians have been systematically educated in economics and have a solid foundation of studies of Confucian classics. The new historical textual research regards the classics as the material of the historiography. At the same time, it argues that the study of the ancient history should be started with the study of the classics. And then, in the study of the classics, the combination of the rule of Confucian classics and the history of the examinations is surpassed. The new history textbook treats Confucian classics attitude, not only expands the scope of the study of history, at the same time opens up a new realm in the methodology and concept of learning, reaping a great deal of fruit. The relationship between Confucian classics and new historical textual research is closely related. When discussing the modern transformation of Chinese historiography, we should not neglect the function and influence of classical Chinese learning.