Clinical Impact of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Use in Patients Following Everolimus-eluting Stent Impl

来源 :第13届中国介入心脏病学大会(CJT2015) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:skyskysky094411
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  Background: Studies have suggested that use of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following new generation drug-eluting stent implantation may increase costs and potential bleeding events.This study aimed to investigate the association of DAPT status with clinical safety in patients undergoing everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation in the SEEDS study (A Registry to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Everolimus Drug-eluting Stent for Coronary Revascularization) at 2-year follow-up.Methods: The SEEDS study is a prospective, multicenter study, where patients (n =1900) with small vessel, long lesion, or multi-vessel diseases underwent EES implantation.Detailed DAPT status was collected at baseline, 6-month, 1-and 2-year.DAPT interruption was defined as any interruption of aspirin and/or clopidogrel more than 14 days.The net adverse clinical events (NACE, a composite endpoint of all-cause death, all myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST), and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium Ⅱ-Ⅴ)) were investigated according to the DAPT status at 2-year follow-up.Results: DAPT was used in 97.8% of patients at 6 months, 69.5% at 12 months and 35.4% at 2 years.It was observed that the incidence of NACE was low (8.1%) at 2 years follow-up, especially its components of all-cause death (0.9%), stroke (1.1%), and definite/probable ST (0.7%).DAPT was not an independent predictor of composite endpoint of all-cause death/MI/stroke (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.693, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.096-4.980, P =0.715) and NACE (HR: 1.041, 95% CI: 0.145-7.454, P =0.968).Of 73 patients who had DAPT interruption, no patient had ST at 12-month, and only 1 patient experienced ST between 1-and 2-year (1.4%).There was a high frequency of major bleeding events (53/65, 82.5%) occurred in patients receiving DAPT treatment.Conclusions: Prolonged DAPT use was not associated with improved clinical safety.The study emphasized that duration of DAPT needs to be shortened in Chinese patients following EES implantation (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 01157455).
其他文献
  Background: Recent studies reported that percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation was safe and feasible for the treatment of left main cor
会议