论文部分内容阅读
民事诉讼检察监督问题是一个在我国学术论争中严重失衡的话题。论争的失衡已经在立法与司法解释中造成了不当后果。而深究其原因,就在于我国法学界在本议题的研究中误用了注释法学方法,导致研究视域始终局限于法本体论范畴之内。实质上,我国民事诉讼检察监督得以实现的原因在于权力生态系统的深刻微调,但这并不是一种有利的结果。因为检察机关对于民事诉讼的深度介入将在司法生态意义上进一步破坏纠纷解决机制的正义性和效率性。着眼于长远,我国应当在遵循司法生态的前提下,确保法院司法审判权的完整性,将民事诉讼检察监督定位于违法监督。
Prosecutorial supervision of civil litigation is a topic of serious imbalance in our academic debate. The imbalance of arguments has caused undue consequences in the legislative and judicial interpretations. The reason to go deep into it is that the jurisprudence of our country has misused the annotation jurisprudence in the research of this topic, which has led the research horizon to be confined to the category of legal ontology. In essence, the reason for the procuratorial supervision of civil litigation in our country lies in the profound fine adjustment of the power ecosystem, but this is not a favorable outcome. Because the procuratorial organs’ deep involvement in civil litigation will further undermine the justice and efficiency of the dispute resolution mechanism in the judicial and ecological sense. With a view to the long term, our country should ensure the integrity of the judicial jurisdiction of the courts and follow the judicial ecology to locate the procuratorial supervision of civil proceedings in the supervision of the illegal activities.