论文部分内容阅读
2014年开年至今,我国日渐密集的反垄断执法活动引发广泛关注。针对当前积极有为的执法态势,支持者认为我国监管进入新常态,应进一步向国际看齐,加强力度。反对者批评反垄断风暴干预经营自由,惩罚优胜者,有损投资环境。两种意见的根本分歧在于如何界定政府与市场的关系。政府和市场均可能失灵。迷信市场万能,主张自由放任,要求政府扮演“守夜人”的消极角色,事实证明行不通。2008年国际金融危机爆发,很大程度上是美国政府纵容金融资本自由发展的结果。反观我国改革开放以来,跨国公司充分利用我国监管漏洞,某些在美欧将面临严惩和巨额赔偿风险的垄断行为,如价格卡特尔、转售价格限制、滥用知识
Since the start of 2014, the increasingly intensive antitrust enforcement activities in our country have drawn wide attention. In response to the current proactive law enforcement posture, supporters believe that our country’s regulation has entered a new normal and should further align itself with the world and step up its efforts. Opponents criticized the antitrust storm intervention in operating freedom, punishing the winners, undermine the investment environment. The fundamental difference between the two opinions lies in how to define the relationship between the government and the market. Both government and markets may fail. Superstitious universal market, advocating laissez-faire, requiring the government to play a “night watchman” negative role, it turns out to be impracticable. The outbreak of the international financial crisis in 2008 was to a large extent the result of the U.S. government’s condoning the free development of financial capital. In contrast, since the reform and opening up in our country, multinational corporations have made full use of the regulatory loopholes in our country. Certain monopolistic behaviors such as price cartels, resale price restrictions and abuse of knowledge, which are subject to severe penalties and huge compensation risks in the United States and Europe,